A few days ago we facilitated a passionate discussion on the subject of
Blueprints (ah, the joys of an emerging market). The gist of the conversation
was focused on deciding where limited marketing resources should be applied,
and during that exercise a surprising insight came to us. It seemed so
counter-intuitive at first, then as we kept exploring it became so blindingly
obvious that we questioned our intelligence for not thinking of it before.
What was this revelation, you ask – and more importantly, why should you
care?
An Architect doesn’t need a Blueprint.
Let’s step outside IT for a moment and use the analogy of a Blueprint for a
building to illustrate this point, since no one questions the value of either
an Architect or the Blueprint in that context. The Architect has the smarts;
with years of experience they interview the client to gather requirements and ... (more)
A shift is finally occurring in the Cloud Computing discourse. Topics like
"what is it" have been supplanted by more useful questions such as "should I
do it?", "how should I do it?", and "when should I do it?" In appreciation of
this new phase of Cloud Computing adoption, we'd like to offer some thoughts
on some of the common pitfalls of both public and private Clouds so that you
might avoid them as you evaluate and implement cloud solutions.
1. Not understanding the business value
It's important to weigh a Cloud solution versus the traditional approach
through the lens of busine... (more)
In a previous post we discussed the positive shift in the cloud computing
discourse towards actionable steps rather than philosophical diatribes on
definitions. And to support that discussion we offered the following list of
things not to do:
Not understanding the business value Assuming server virtualization is enough
Not understanding service dependencies Leveraging traditional monitoring Not
understanding internal/external costs
As we continue our discussion of these missteps, in this post we'll address
both a mistake and a common misconception.
Cloud computing is not about an... (more)
The past week hosted the increasingly popular VMworld 2010 event at the
Moscone Center in San Francisco. The title of the conference was "Virtual
Roads, Actual Clouds", but the undercurrent of the show was all about ‘VM
stall' and of course whatever vendor XYZ can do to help you get your VM
deployment moving again. While we certainly want to un-stick any optimization
effort, it's often prudent to understand WHY something happened before
attempting to fix it.
It's difficult to generalize the reasons for every situation, but we're
willing to venture a guess: failing to understand ... (more)
In our last post we discussed the positive shift in the Cloud Computing
discourse towards actionable steps rather than philosophical diatribes on
definitions. And to support that discussion we offered the following list of
things not to do:
Not understanding the business value Assuming server virtualization is enough
Not understanding service dependencies Leveraging traditional monitoring Not
understanding internal/external costs
In this installment we are going to focus on the first mistake - failing to
understand the business impact of leveraging a Cloud delivery model for a
g... (more)